← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Seed-2.0-Lite vs Claude Haiku 4.5
List-price comparison ·Seed-2.0-Lite details ·Claude Haiku 4.5 details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Seed-2.0-Lite is the cheapest — 66% less than the priciest here ($110.00/mo vs $320.00/mo).
| Seed-2.0-Lite | Claude Haiku 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.250 | $1.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $5.00 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0011 | $0.0032 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 200k tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 64k tokens |
| Quality score | 68/100 | 70/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Anthropic |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Seed-2.0-Lite | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $1.10 | $3.20 |
| 10,000 | $11.00 | $32.00 |
| 100,000 | $110.00 | $320.00 |
Seed-2.0-Lite
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Very low latency for high-volume, simple tasks — classification, short summaries, and lightweight chat where response time matters more than depth.
Noticeably weaker on multi-step reasoning and long-context synthesis; pairing with a larger model for escalation is common.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.