← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Llama 4 Maverick vs Jev Router
List-price comparison ·Llama 4 Maverick details ·Jev Router details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Jev Router is the cheapest — 329218207% less than the priciest here ($-160,000,000/mo vs $48.60/mo).
| Llama 4 Maverick | Jev Router | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.188 | $-1000000.000 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.652 | $-1000000.000 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0005 | $-1,600 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | — |
| Quality score | 74/100 | 30/100 |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | Meta | TypeSafe |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Llama 4 Maverick | Jev Router |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.486 | $-1,600,000 |
| 10,000 | $4.86 | $-16,000,000 |
| 100,000 | $48.60 | $-160,000,000 |
Llama 4 Maverick
Strong multi-modal (text + image) open-weight model with a 1M-token context window — good for self-hosted or fine-tuned deployments.
Smaller completion-token cap (16K) than newer commercial models limits very long single-turn outputs — chunk long generations.
Jev Router
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.