Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick
List-price comparison ·Gemini 3.1 Pro details ·Llama 4 Maverick details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 4 Maverick is the cheapest — 92% less than the priciest here ($56.00/mo vs $720.00/mo).
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $0.200 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $12.00 | $0.800 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0072 | $0.0006 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Quality score | 93/100 | 74/100 |
| Tier | Flagship | Balanced |
| Provider | Meta |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $7.20 | $0.56 |
| 10,000 | $72.00 | $5.60 |
| 100,000 | $720.00 | $56.00 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Native audio, video, and document understanding with a ~1M token context window — strong fit for multi-modal RAG and large-document analysis.
Output token cost is steep relative to input, and the largest context windows can be slow to fill — chunk large documents where possible.
Llama 4 Maverick
Strong multi-modal (text + image) open-weight model with a 1M-token context window — good for self-hosted or fine-tuned deployments.
Smaller completion-token cap (16K) than newer commercial models limits very long single-turn outputs — chunk long generations.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.