Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 Max
List-price comparison ·Llama 4 Maverick details ·Qwen3 Max details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 4 Maverick is the cheapest — 78% less than the priciest here ($56.00/mo vs $249.60/mo).
| Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.200 | $0.780 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.800 | $3.90 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0006 | $0.0025 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Quality score | 74/100 | 78/100 |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | Meta | Qwen |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.56 | $2.50 |
| 10,000 | $5.60 | $24.96 |
| 100,000 | $56.00 | $249.60 |
Llama 4 Maverick
Strong multi-modal (text + image) open-weight model with a 1M-token context window — good for self-hosted or fine-tuned deployments.
Smaller completion-token cap (16K) than newer commercial models limits very long single-turn outputs — chunk long generations.
Qwen3 Max
Strong multilingual reasoning (especially Chinese/English) and competitive coding benchmarks at open-weight pricing.
Cache-write pricing is unusually high relative to input cost — workloads that rely heavily on prompt caching should benchmark actual savings.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.