← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
List-price comparison ·Llama 4 Maverick details ·Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 4 Maverick is the cheapest — 57% less than the priciest here ($51.84/mo vs $119.20/mo).
| Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.200 | $0.660 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.696 | $1.00 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0005 | $0.0012 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 115,200 tokens | 29,491 tokens |
| Quality score | 74/100 | 83/100 |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | Meta | Qwen |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.5184 | $1.19 |
| 10,000 | $5.18 | $11.92 |
| 100,000 | $51.84 | $119.20 |
Llama 4 Maverick
Strong multi-modal (text + image) open-weight model with a 1M-token context window — good for self-hosted or fine-tuned deployments.
Smaller completion-token cap (16K) than newer commercial models limits very long single-turn outputs — chunk long generations.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.