← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (batch)
List-price comparison ·Llama 4 Maverick details ·GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (batch) details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 4 Maverick is the cheapest — 70% less than the priciest here ($48.60/mo vs $160.00/mo).
| Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.188 | $0.500 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.652 | $2.50 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0005 | $0.0016 |
| Context window | 524,288 tokens | 1050k tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 128k tokens |
| Quality score | 74/100 | 88/100 |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.486 | $1.60 |
| 10,000 | $4.86 | $16.00 |
| 100,000 | $48.60 | $160.00 |
Llama 4 Maverick
Strong multi-modal (text + image) open-weight model with a 1M-token context window — good for self-hosted or fine-tuned deployments.
Smaller completion-token cap (16K) than newer commercial models limits very long single-turn outputs — chunk long generations.
GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (batch)
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.