← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Llama 4 Maverick vs Codestral 2508 (batch)
List-price comparison ·Llama 4 Maverick details ·Codestral 2508 (batch) details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Codestral 2508 (batch) is the cheapest — 31% less than the priciest here ($36.00/mo vs $51.84/mo).
| Llama 4 Maverick | Codestral 2508 (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.200 | $0.150 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.696 | $0.450 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0005 | $0.0004 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 256k tokens |
| Max output | 115,200 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Quality score | 74/100 | 78/100 |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Llama 4 Maverick | Codestral 2508 (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.5184 | $0.36 |
| 10,000 | $5.18 | $3.60 |
| 100,000 | $51.84 | $36.00 |
Llama 4 Maverick
Strong multi-modal (text + image) open-weight model with a 1M-token context window — good for self-hosted or fine-tuned deployments.
Smaller completion-token cap (16K) than newer commercial models limits very long single-turn outputs — chunk long generations.
Codestral 2508 (batch)
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.