← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Llama 3.3 70B vs gpt-oss-120b (batch)
List-price comparison ·Llama 3.3 70B details ·gpt-oss-120b (batch) details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 3.3 70B is the cheapest — 41% less than the priciest here ($24.80/mo vs $42.00/mo).
| Llama 3.3 70B | gpt-oss-120b (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.100 | $0.150 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.320 | $0.600 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0002 | $0.0004 |
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 117,964 tokens |
| Quality score | 60/100 | 82/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Llama 3.3 70B | gpt-oss-120b (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.248 | $0.42 |
| 10,000 | $2.48 | $4.20 |
| 100,000 | $24.80 | $42.00 |
Llama 3.3 70B
Mature, well-supported open-weight model for general chat and lightweight agents — wide availability across inference providers keeps pricing competitive.
Falls behind newer flagship models on complex reasoning and coding — best suited to well-scoped, repetitive tasks.
gpt-oss-120b (batch)
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.