Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 3.3 70B
List-price comparison ·Gemini 3.1 Pro details ·Llama 3.3 70B details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 3.3 70B is the cheapest — 96% less than the priciest here ($31.60/mo vs $720.00/mo).
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | Llama 3.3 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $0.130 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $12.00 | $0.400 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0072 | $0.0003 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 128k tokens |
| Quality score | 93/100 | 60/100 |
| Tier | Flagship | Flash |
| Provider | Meta |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $7.20 | $0.316 |
| 10,000 | $72.00 | $3.16 |
| 100,000 | $720.00 | $31.60 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Native audio, video, and document understanding with a ~1M token context window — strong fit for multi-modal RAG and large-document analysis.
Output token cost is steep relative to input, and the largest context windows can be slow to fill — chunk large documents where possible.
Llama 3.3 70B
Mature, well-supported open-weight model for general chat and lightweight agents — wide availability across inference providers keeps pricing competitive.
Falls behind newer flagship models on complex reasoning and coding — best suited to well-scoped, repetitive tasks.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.