← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Llama 3.3 70B vs GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)
List-price comparison ·Llama 3.3 70B details ·GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 3.3 70B is the cheapest — 93% less than the priciest here ($24.80/mo vs $360.00/mo).
| Llama 3.3 70B | GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.100 | $1.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.320 | $6.00 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0002 | $0.0036 |
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1050k tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 128k tokens |
| Quality score | 60/100 | 78/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Llama 3.3 70B | GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.248 | $3.60 |
| 10,000 | $2.48 | $36.00 |
| 100,000 | $24.80 | $360.00 |
Llama 3.3 70B
Mature, well-supported open-weight model for general chat and lightweight agents — wide availability across inference providers keeps pricing competitive.
Falls behind newer flagship models on complex reasoning and coding — best suited to well-scoped, repetitive tasks.
GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.