← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Llama 3.3 70B vs GPT-5.4 Nano (batch)
List-price comparison ·Llama 3.3 70B details ·GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 3.3 70B is the cheapest — 15% less than the priciest here ($31.60/mo vs $37.00/mo).
| Llama 3.3 70B | GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.130 | $0.100 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.400 | $0.625 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0003 | $0.0004 |
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 400k tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 128k tokens |
| Quality score | 60/100 | 62/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Llama 3.3 70B | GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.316 | $0.37 |
| 10,000 | $3.16 | $3.70 |
| 100,000 | $31.60 | $37.00 |
Llama 3.3 70B
Mature, well-supported open-weight model for general chat and lightweight agents — wide availability across inference providers keeps pricing competitive.
Falls behind newer flagship models on complex reasoning and coding — best suited to well-scoped, repetitive tasks.
GPT-5.4 Nano (batch)
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.