← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Llama 4 Maverick
List-price comparison ·LFM2.5-24B-A2B details ·Llama 4 Maverick details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 4 Maverick is the cheapest — 7% less than the priciest here ($48.60/mo vs $52.00/mo).
| LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.100 | $0.188 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.00 | $0.652 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0005 | $0.0005 |
| Context window | 128k tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Quality score | 68/100 | 74/100 |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | LiquidAI | Meta |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.52 | $0.486 |
| 10,000 | $5.20 | $4.86 |
| 100,000 | $52.00 | $48.60 |
LFM2.5-24B-A2B
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
Llama 4 Maverick
Strong multi-modal (text + image) open-weight model with a 1M-token context window — good for self-hosted or fine-tuned deployments.
Smaller completion-token cap (16K) than newer commercial models limits very long single-turn outputs — chunk long generations.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.