← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Claude Opus 4.8 vs LFM2.5-24B-A2B
List-price comparison ·Claude Opus 4.8 details ·LFM2.5-24B-A2B details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), LFM2.5-24B-A2B is the cheapest — 97% less than the priciest here ($52.00/mo vs $1,600.00/mo).
| Claude Opus 4.8 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $0.100 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.016 | $0.0005 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 128k tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Quality score | 97/100 | 68/100 |
| Tier | Flagship | Balanced |
| Provider | Anthropic | LiquidAI |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Claude Opus 4.8 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $16.00 | $0.52 |
| 10,000 | $160.00 | $5.20 |
| 100,000 | $1,600.00 | $52.00 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Best-in-class for complex multi-step agentic workflows, long-horizon planning, and large codebase refactors. Strong instruction-following on ambiguous, open-ended tasks.
Highest per-token cost in the catalog and noticeably higher latency — reserve for tasks that genuinely need top-tier reasoning rather than routine completions.
LFM2.5-24B-A2B
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.