chooseaimodel
← Compare models

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

List-price comparison ·DeepSeek V3.2 details ·Gemini 3.1 Pro details

ShareXFacebookLinkedIn

For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), DeepSeek V3.2 is the cheapest — 93% less than the priciest here ($48.28/mo vs $720.00/mo).

 DeepSeek V3.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input / 1M tokens$0.269$2.00
Output / 1M tokens$0.400$12.00
Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out)$0.0005$0.0072
Context window163,840 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens65,536 tokens
Quality score79/10093/100
TierBalancedFlagship
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle

Projected monthly cost

Requests / moDeepSeek V3.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
1,000$0.4828$7.20
10,000$4.83$72.00
100,000$48.28$720.00
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →

DeepSeek V3.2

Extremely competitive coding and reasoning benchmarks at a fraction of commercial-API pricing — strong default for cost-sensitive batch workloads.

Open-weight hosting means latency and uptime vary by inference provider (DeepInfra, Fireworks, etc.) — pin a provider or add fallbacks for production SLAs.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Native audio, video, and document understanding with a ~1M token context window — strong fit for multi-modal RAG and large-document analysis.

Output token cost is steep relative to input, and the largest context windows can be slow to fill — chunk large documents where possible.

More comparisons

Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.