Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V3.2
List-price comparison · Claude Opus 4.8 details · DeepSeek V3.2 details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), DeepSeek V3.2 costs 97% less — $41.18/mo vs $1,600.00/mo.
| Claude Opus 4.8 | DeepSeek V3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $0.229 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | $0.343 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.016 | $0.0004 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 64k tokens |
| Tier | Flagship | Balanced |
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
Projected monthly cost
Rows open both models in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts there.
Claude Opus 4.8
Best-in-class for complex multi-step agentic workflows, long-horizon planning, and large codebase refactors. Strong instruction-following on ambiguous, open-ended tasks.
Highest per-token cost in the catalog and noticeably higher latency — reserve for tasks that genuinely need top-tier reasoning rather than routine completions.
DeepSeek V3.2
Extremely competitive coding and reasoning benchmarks at a fraction of commercial-API pricing — strong default for cost-sensitive batch workloads.
Open-weight hosting means latency and uptime vary by inference provider (DeepInfra, Fireworks, etc.) — pin a provider or add fallbacks for production SLAs.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.