← All models
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-Flash
List-price comparison · Claude Haiku 4.5 details · Qwen3.5-Flash details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Qwen3.5-Flash costs 94% less — $18.20/mo vs $320.00/mo.
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.00 | $0.065 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $0.260 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0032 | $0.0002 |
| Context window | 200k tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max output | 64k tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | Anthropic | Qwen |
Projected monthly cost
1,000 requests / month$3.20 vs $0.18210,000 requests / month$32.00 vs $1.82100,000 requests / month$320.00 vs $18.20
Rows open both models in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts there.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Very low latency for high-volume, simple tasks — classification, short summaries, and lightweight chat where response time matters more than depth.
Noticeably weaker on multi-step reasoning and long-context synthesis; pairing with a larger model for escalation is common.
Qwen3.5-Flash
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.