chooseaimodel
← Compare models

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1

List-price comparison ·Claude Haiku 4.5 details ·DeepSeek R1 details

ShareXFacebookLinkedIn

For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), DeepSeek R1 is the cheapest — 54% less than the priciest here ($146.00/mo vs $320.00/mo).

 Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek R1
Input / 1M tokens$1.00$0.500
Output / 1M tokens$5.00$2.15
Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out)$0.0032$0.0015
Context window200k tokens163,840 tokens
Max output64k tokens32,768 tokens
Quality score70/10084/100
TierFlashFlagship
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek

Projected monthly cost

Requests / moClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek R1
1,000$3.20$1.46
10,000$32.00$14.60
100,000$320.00$146.00
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →

Claude Haiku 4.5

Very low latency for high-volume, simple tasks — classification, short summaries, and lightweight chat where response time matters more than depth.

Noticeably weaker on multi-step reasoning and long-context synthesis; pairing with a larger model for escalation is common.

DeepSeek R1

Chain-of-thought reasoning competitive with closed flagship models on math and logic benchmarks, at open-weight pricing.

Emits long reasoning traces that inflate output token counts and cost — cap reasoning length or use a distilled variant for latency-sensitive paths.

More comparisons

Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.