← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ling-3.0-flash
List-price comparison ·Claude Haiku 4.5 details ·Ling-3.0-flash details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Ling-3.0-flash is the cheapest — 94% less than the priciest here ($17.80/mo vs $320.00/mo).
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Ling-3.0-flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.00 | $0.075 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $0.220 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0032 | $0.0002 |
| Context window | 200k tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 64k tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Quality score | 70/100 | 52/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | Anthropic | InclusionAI |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Ling-3.0-flash |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $3.20 | $0.178 |
| 10,000 | $32.00 | $1.78 |
| 100,000 | $320.00 | $17.80 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Very low latency for high-volume, simple tasks — classification, short summaries, and lightweight chat where response time matters more than depth.
Noticeably weaker on multi-step reasoning and long-context synthesis; pairing with a larger model for escalation is common.
Ling-3.0-flash
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.