← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Llama 3.3 70B
List-price comparison ·Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) details ·Llama 3.3 70B details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 3.3 70B is the cheapest — 80% less than the priciest here ($31.60/mo vs $160.00/mo).
| Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) | Llama 3.3 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.500 | $0.130 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.50 | $0.400 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0016 | $0.0003 |
| Context window | 200k tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 64k tokens | 128k tokens |
| Quality score | 75/100 | 60/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $1.60 | $0.316 |
| 10,000 | $16.00 | $3.16 |
| 100,000 | $160.00 | $31.60 |
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
Llama 3.3 70B
Mature, well-supported open-weight model for general chat and lightweight agents — wide availability across inference providers keeps pricing competitive.
Falls behind newer flagship models on complex reasoning and coding — best suited to well-scoped, repetitive tasks.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.