← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Ling-2.6-1T vs Llama 4 Maverick
List-price comparison ·Ling-2.6-1T details ·Llama 4 Maverick details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Ling-2.6-1T is the cheapest — 39% less than the priciest here ($34.00/mo vs $56.00/mo).
| Ling-2.6-1T | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.075 | $0.200 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.625 | $0.800 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0003 | $0.0006 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Quality score | 72/100 | 74/100 |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | InclusionAI | Meta |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Ling-2.6-1T | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.34 | $0.56 |
| 10,000 | $3.40 | $5.60 |
| 100,000 | $34.00 | $56.00 |
Ling-2.6-1T
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
Llama 4 Maverick
Strong multi-modal (text + image) open-weight model with a 1M-token context window — good for self-hosted or fine-tuned deployments.
Smaller completion-token cap (16K) than newer commercial models limits very long single-turn outputs — chunk long generations.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.