← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
GPT-5.4 vs Mercury 2.5
List-price comparison ·GPT-5.4 details ·Mercury 2.5 details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Mercury 2.5 is the cheapest — 99% less than the priciest here ($10.80/mo vs $900.00/mo).
| GPT-5.4 | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $2.50 | $0.040 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $15.00 | $0.150 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.009 | $0.0001 |
| Context window | 1050k tokens | 260k tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Quality score | 95/100 | 72/100 |
| Tier | Flagship | Balanced |
| Provider | OpenAI | Inception |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | GPT-5.4 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $9.00 | $0.108 |
| 10,000 | $90.00 | $1.08 |
| 100,000 | $900.00 | $10.80 |
GPT-5.4
Excellent general-purpose reasoning and broad world knowledge, with strong performance on coding, math, and multi-modal (image + file) inputs.
Output tokens are priced well above input tokens, so verbose responses dominate cost — tight max-token limits and prompt caching matter.
Mercury 2.5
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.