← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
GPT-5.4 Nano vs GLM 4.7 Flash
List-price comparison ·GPT-5.4 Nano details ·GLM 4.7 Flash details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), GLM 4.7 Flash is the cheapest — 69% less than the priciest here ($23.26/mo vs $74.00/mo).
| GPT-5.4 Nano | GLM 4.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.200 | $0.060 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.25 | $0.400 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0007 | $0.0002 |
| Context window | 400k tokens | 200k tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 117,964 tokens |
| Quality score | 62/100 | 72/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | OpenAI | Z.ai |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | GPT-5.4 Nano | GLM 4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.74 | $0.2326 |
| 10,000 | $7.40 | $2.33 |
| 100,000 | $74.00 | $23.26 |
GPT-5.4 Nano
Cheapest OpenAI option for high-throughput classification, tagging, and routing — ideal as a first-pass filter before a stronger model.
Limited reasoning depth means it should be treated as a triage layer, not a final answer source, for anything business-critical.
GLM 4.7 Flash
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.