← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3.6 Flash
List-price comparison ·GPT-5.4 Nano details ·Qwen3.6 Flash details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Qwen3.6 Flash is the cheapest — 9% less than the priciest here ($67.50/mo vs $74.00/mo).
| GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.200 | $0.188 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.25 | $1.13 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0007 | $0.0007 |
| Context window | 400k tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Quality score | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | OpenAI | Qwen |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.74 | $0.675 |
| 10,000 | $7.40 | $6.75 |
| 100,000 | $74.00 | $67.50 |
GPT-5.4 Nano
Cheapest OpenAI option for high-throughput classification, tagging, and routing — ideal as a first-pass filter before a stronger model.
Limited reasoning depth means it should be treated as a triage layer, not a final answer source, for anything business-critical.
Qwen3.6 Flash
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.