← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Ling 3.1 Flash
List-price comparison ·GPT-5.4 Nano details ·Ling 3.1 Flash details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheapest — 76% less than the priciest here ($18.00/mo vs $74.00/mo).
| GPT-5.4 Nano | Ling 3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.200 | $0.075 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.25 | $0.225 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0007 | $0.0002 |
| Context window | 400k tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 235,929 tokens |
| Quality score | 62/100 | 58/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | OpenAI | InclusionAI |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | GPT-5.4 Nano | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.74 | $0.18 |
| 10,000 | $7.40 | $1.80 |
| 100,000 | $74.00 | $18.00 |
GPT-5.4 Nano
Cheapest OpenAI option for high-throughput classification, tagging, and routing — ideal as a first-pass filter before a stronger model.
Limited reasoning depth means it should be treated as a triage layer, not a final answer source, for anything business-critical.
Ling 3.1 Flash
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.