← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
GPT-5.4 Mini vs LFM2.5-24B-A2B
List-price comparison ·GPT-5.4 Mini details ·LFM2.5-24B-A2B details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), LFM2.5-24B-A2B is the cheapest — 81% less than the priciest here ($52.00/mo vs $270.00/mo).
| GPT-5.4 Mini | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.750 | $0.100 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $4.50 | $1.00 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0027 | $0.0005 |
| Context window | 400k tokens | 128k tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Quality score | 80/100 | 68/100 |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | OpenAI | LiquidAI |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | GPT-5.4 Mini | LFM2.5-24B-A2B |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $2.70 | $0.52 |
| 10,000 | $27.00 | $5.20 |
| 100,000 | $270.00 | $52.00 |
GPT-5.4 Mini
Good default for everyday chat, summarization, and lightweight agent steps where GPT-5.4-level reasoning isn't required.
Quality gap widens on long, multi-hop reasoning tasks — needs careful prompt design to avoid silent failures on edge cases.
LFM2.5-24B-A2B
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.