← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Command R7B (12-2024) vs GPT-5.4 Nano
List-price comparison ·Command R7B (12-2024) details ·GPT-5.4 Nano details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Command R7B (12-2024) is the cheapest — 86% less than the priciest here ($10.50/mo vs $74.00/mo).
| Command R7B (12-2024) | GPT-5.4 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.037 | $0.200 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.150 | $1.25 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0001 | $0.0007 |
| Context window | 128k tokens | 400k tokens |
| Max output | 4k tokens | 128k tokens |
| Quality score | 68/100 | 62/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | Cohere | OpenAI |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Command R7B (12-2024) | GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.105 | $0.74 |
| 10,000 | $1.05 | $7.40 |
| 100,000 | $10.50 | $74.00 |
Command R7B (12-2024)
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
GPT-5.4 Nano
Cheapest OpenAI option for high-throughput classification, tagging, and routing — ideal as a first-pass filter before a stronger model.
Limited reasoning depth means it should be treated as a triage layer, not a final answer source, for anything business-critical.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.