← All models
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-27B
List-price comparison · Claude Sonnet 4.6 details · Qwen3.5-27B details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Qwen3.5-27B costs 91% less — $85.80/mo vs $960.00/mo.
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Qwen3.5-27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $0.195 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $15.00 | $1.56 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0096 | $0.0009 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | Anthropic | Qwen |
Projected monthly cost
1,000 requests / month$9.60 vs $0.85810,000 requests / month$96.00 vs $8.58100,000 requests / month$960.00 vs $85.80
Rows open both models in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts there.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Strong price-to-performance for production agents: reliable tool use, structured JSON output, and solid coding ability at roughly a fifth of Opus's cost.
Can still misstep on the hardest multi-step reasoning chains where Opus would succeed — budget for occasional escalation to a flagship model.
Qwen3.5-27B
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.