← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs Claude Opus 4.8
List-price comparison ·ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B details ·Claude Opus 4.8 details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B is the cheapest — 94% less than the priciest here ($100.40/mo vs $1,600.00/mo).
| ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B | Claude Opus 4.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.420 | $5.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.25 | $25.00 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.001 | $0.016 |
| Context window | 123k tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max output | 16k tokens | 128k tokens |
| Quality score | 80/100 | 97/100 |
| Tier | Flagship | Flagship |
| Provider | Baidu | Anthropic |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $1.00 | $16.00 |
| 10,000 | $10.04 | $160.00 |
| 100,000 | $100.40 | $1,600.00 |
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
Claude Opus 4.8
Best-in-class for complex multi-step agentic workflows, long-horizon planning, and large codebase refactors. Strong instruction-following on ambiguous, open-ended tasks.
Highest per-token cost in the catalog and noticeably higher latency — reserve for tasks that genuinely need top-tier reasoning rather than routine completions.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.