← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) vs Llama 4 Maverick
List-price comparison ·Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) details ·Llama 4 Maverick details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 4 Maverick is the cheapest — 88% less than the priciest here ($56.00/mo vs $480.00/mo).
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.50 | $0.200 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $7.50 | $0.800 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0048 | $0.0006 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 64k tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Quality score | 90/100 | 74/100 |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $4.80 | $0.56 |
| 10,000 | $48.00 | $5.60 |
| 100,000 | $480.00 | $56.00 |
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch)
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
Llama 4 Maverick
Strong multi-modal (text + image) open-weight model with a 1M-token context window — good for self-hosted or fine-tuned deployments.
Smaller completion-token cap (16K) than newer commercial models limits very long single-turn outputs — chunk long generations.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.