← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Llama 3.3 70B
List-price comparison ·Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) details ·Llama 3.3 70B details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is the cheapest — 35% less than the priciest here ($16.00/mo vs $24.80/mo).
| Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | Llama 3.3 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.050 | $0.100 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.250 | $0.320 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0002 | $0.0002 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Quality score | 68/100 | 60/100 |
| Tier | Flash | Flash |
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0.16 | $0.248 |
| 10,000 | $1.60 | $2.48 |
| 100,000 | $16.00 | $24.80 |
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch)
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
Llama 3.3 70B
Mature, well-supported open-weight model for general chat and lightweight agents — wide availability across inference providers keeps pricing competitive.
Falls behind newer flagship models on complex reasoning and coding — best suited to well-scoped, repetitive tasks.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.