← Compare models
Open all in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts →
Aion-3.0 vs Llama 4 Maverick
List-price comparison ·Aion-3.0 details ·Llama 4 Maverick details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), Llama 4 Maverick is the cheapest — 91% less than the priciest here ($51.84/mo vs $600.00/mo).
| Aion-3.0 | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $0.200 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $6.00 | $0.696 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.006 | $0.0005 |
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 115,200 tokens |
| Quality score | 68/100 | 74/100 |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | AionLabs | Meta |
Projected monthly cost
| Requests / mo | Aion-3.0 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $6.00 | $0.5184 |
| 10,000 | $60.00 | $5.18 |
| 100,000 | $600.00 | $51.84 |
Aion-3.0
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
Llama 4 Maverick
Strong multi-modal (text + image) open-weight model with a 1M-token context window — good for self-hosted or fine-tuned deployments.
Smaller completion-token cap (16K) than newer commercial models limits very long single-turn outputs — chunk long generations.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.