← All models
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
List-price comparison · Claude Sonnet 4.6 details · GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k details
For a typical workload (100,000 requests / mo), GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k costs 46% less — $520.00/mo vs $960.00/mo.
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $15.00 | $4.00 |
| Typical request (1,200 in + 400 out) | $0.0096 | $0.0052 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 16,385 tokens |
| Max output | 128k tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
Projected monthly cost
1,000 requests / month$9.60 vs $5.2010,000 requests / month$96.00 vs $52.00100,000 requests / month$960.00 vs $520.00
Rows open both models in the calculator — adjust volume and token counts there.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Strong price-to-performance for production agents: reliable tool use, structured JSON output, and solid coding ability at roughly a fifth of Opus's cost.
Can still misstep on the hardest multi-step reasoning chains where Opus would succeed — budget for occasional escalation to a flagship model.
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Auto-synced from OpenRouter — no editorial write-up yet.
More comparisons
Vendor list rates · per-request examples assume 1,200 input + 400 output tokens.